In our last article, I wrote about sudden hearing
loss, its causes and why it happens. This catastrophic condition is regarded as
one of the few ear emergencies where early treatment within the first two weeks
has been shown to significantly improve the outcome and potential recovery of
the hearing loss.
Often the cause of the hearing loss is not obvious.
The hearing suddenly drops and may be associated with a ringing noise in the
ear and /or disequilibrium. This depends on whether the effect is limited to
the hearing organ only or also affect our balance organ function too as they
share the same inner ear fluids. The screening battery tests may not show any
obvious diagnosis but treatment for this condition should not be delayed. The
current medical thinking is that there is an insult to the inner ear which
could be a blocked micro-vessel that starves the cochlear of its blood supply
and oxygen or perhaps it is an inflammation of the cochlea by possibly a virus.
In either cases, the ear often looks normal and imaging is usually
unremarkable. The dilemma that physicians face is do we wait for the condition
to declare itself to get the right diagnosis, or do we act with a “shotgun”
treatment of different drugs to prevent further ear damage and set the course
for early recovery? The answer is we should act “blindly”. We have to remember
that we are unable to cut out the inner ear for test sampling as doing so is a
major operation and the operation would certainly kill the ear and its hearing.
What constitutes this shotgun rescue treatment? It
is thought that perhaps a virus might be the cause so a week’s course of high dose antiviral medication is given.
Inflammation from a viral attack, diabetes mellitus event or deoxygenation of
the nerves, is treated with a two week
course of high dose steroids which is frontloaded at a high dose, slowly
tailoring downwards over two weeks to maintain a treatment effect without
causing a sudden steroid withdrawal that could affect the body. This steroid
treatment has been studied extensively and research has shown that if it is
given timely with in two-week golden window from the first reported ate of the
sudden hearting loss symptoms, it is statistically beneficial in improving
partially or totally the loss hearing. It is this research that effects sudden
hearing loss as an emergency, to be recognized early and confirmed so that
treatment can be provided. Such a large dose of oral steroids can cause
complications. One of them is stomach ulcers so this course is accompanied with
a two-week course of proton pump
inhibitors that reduces gastric acid production.
Some patients are unable to take such high dose
steroids e.g. diabetics, patients with viral hepatitis or known gastric ulcer
disease. With these patients, research has shown that liquid steroids can be
injected into the middle ear cavity every 2-3 days for 2 weeks to permit the
steroid drug to diffuse directly into the inner ear where there is “supposed”
to be inflammation and failing nerve function.
This prevents the steroid drug to be in the blood system where it can
exert its side effects on the rest of the body organs even though its target is
only the ear. Attractive as this may sound, it is more invasive and less
economical for the patient, as every two days, the eardrum needs to be pierce
by a needle to deliver the drugs on site. The decision is a risk-benefit
exercise to be discussed with the patient.
Another reason maybe that the blood vessels are
blocked and insufficient blood and oxygen are getting to the delicate hearing
cells. Vasodilators are prescribed
to dilate the small blood vessels to the brain thereby improving brain blood
flow. With any nerve insult, it takes time and ingredients for a nerve to
recover so high-dose Vitamin B Complex,
the building blocks of nerve function, is also prescribed.
Any improvement in the ear’s hearing would usually
be known within the first 6 weeks. Thereafter recovery rates diminish. An MRI
scan is naturally important diagnostically to exclude a brain/ nerfve tumour.
If seen, treatment may include simply observing with annual MRI scanning (as
acoustic neuroma can grow so slowly that no treatment may ever be required), or
radiotherapy or neurosurgery to remove a tumor. Again the choice of treatment
is an exercise of risk versus benefit for such major operations. If diabetes
mellitus is diagnosed, then anti-diabetic medication would be required.
One would think that diagnosing a condition and
providing a “shotgun” or highly specific targeted treatment for a known
diagnosis will solve and rescue the hearing. In this regard, you would be
wrong! In spite of the best efforts and timely care, some patients will continue
to have hearing loss on one side. For these patients, the treatment is
symptomatic. That is to say that if they are socially and professionally
bothered by their one sided hearing loss, normal hearing aids or a surgically
implanted hearing system for single sided deafness may help. If the ear
generates a disturbing ringing ie tinnitus, medical treatment with tinnitus
retraining therapy (TRT) may help.
So losing one’s hearing suddenly should be taken
seriously. Early medical attention to confirm single sided sudden deafness and the
provision of early treatment within two weeks of the episode, may just arrest
and improve the deafness.
The Chinese version of this article was published in Hong Kong Economic Journal on 18 Jul 2016 and 1 Aug 2016